|
S h a r i n g t h e V i s i o n E-Mail Newsletter |
|
| May 20, 2006 |
E-mail the
Newsletter HERE Volume 1, Number 4 |
|
Comments, opinions and articles
in this newsletter are not necessarily those expressed by the STV Group,
and are the sole responsibility of the author of such comment, opinion or
article.
This Newsletter is a new endeavor by breeder members of the WPCSA who support the original breed standards of all sections of Welsh ponies and cobs, and I have volunteered to produce it with the help of all who send me pertinent information, comments and opinions; and everyone is entitled to their opinion. Denise Loeffel |
|
| ARTICLE FROM THE WELSH ROUNDABOUT 1985 | |
|
INDEX Article from the 1985 Welsh Roundabout Part-Bred Registry - Comments and Opinions Excessive White - Comments and Opinions Pictures of Welsh 1960's - 1970's and Welsh & Part-Welsh 2000 - 2006
Pony Registries International Sport Horses (Ponies) of Color Registry American Walking Pony Registry American Grade Horse (Pony) Association Blue Eyed Horse (Pony) Association International Spotted Horse (Pony) Registry Association American Buckskin Registry American Draft Pony Registry Association American Part-Blooded Horse (Pony) Registry Missouri Fox Trotting Pony Registry Oldenburg Registry & International Sport Horse (Pony) Registry International Registry of Color No Website American Crossbred Pony Registry (ACPR)
National Pinto Horse Registry, P.O. Box 486, Oxford, NY 13830-0486 Phone: 607-334-4964 |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
The following are discussions, opinions and emails sent to us by members, some of whom prefer to remain anonymous. PARTBRED REGISTRY |
|
|
Breeders should get a copy of that Hill Pony
Newsletter from Kurt Beecher. Looking at it I was remembering back to when
I first got ponies long ago. Of course there were no pony shows or pony
classes in Texas. The year after I first got a Welsh Pony, 1965, was the
first Welsh Show in Texas, which I did not attend. The next year I went,
the ring was filled with gorgeous section A ponies, almost all Texas Stud
bred, as were mine. There were no B ponies, no Cobs, no half-welsh. Much
later on B ponies had classes but just a few were in this country and none
in Texas. The C and D registry was not carried by the WPSA, it was carried
by Mrs. Ingersall of Buzzard's Bay, Mass. She had all the records in her
dining room and I was at her house when she still had the registry. She
told me the WPSA did not want it and would not register the Cobs. She
brought some Cobs over for performance animals and ended up having the
registry too. When it became apparent that many people wanted them and
were importing them, the WPSA decided it did want the registry and took it
over from Mrs. Ingersall. Along the way, half-welsh were registered too.
I remember seeing 23 in the mature section A stallion class at Tulsa one year, surely not to be repeated nowadays. The year Sun God won the get of sire at the National in the section A division, ( he was leased by Coleman Cowan at the time and C C Silver Lady was in this group of babies) the entire ring was FULL of lines of three animals sired by the same stud. Nowadays the lion's share of the market for Welsh surely has shifted to; B, C, D, and half-welsh. Back in those days our section A ponies were PERFORMANCE animals and could compete with everything from Thoroughbreds to Quarter Horses and everything in between. Kids were TOUGH and could jump 49" ponies over about anything. My own section A ponies were shown regularly in junior jumper and limit hunter. We also exhibited in cross-country and the very first eventing in Texas, over BIG fences that did not knock down! I loved Mountain ponies and still do, and if I was ever going to breed ponies again, it would be A's. They are where it's at! In the breeding of section B, and C, the great old breeders from Wales knew you 'don't get too far from the well', and they always kept some typy A blood in their ponies. Unfortunately there is not a huge demand for the A ponies any more, and instead of the terrific performance animals they used to be, many are now frog faced, fat necked, long backed, lead and feed ponies, or are lead line ponies for a tiny kids. Really too bad and very far removed from what I knew them to be. Luckily there are still some of the original type A ponies around. Partbreds just seem to be another nail in the coffin of the A pony. I am certain they will be bred, and I am certain there is money in them. The Sportpony registry is for them and all other mixed breed ponies who want papers, but it is expensive to register with that group. I do NOT understand WHY someone has not started the AMERICAN HUNTER PONY REGISTRY since that is what many of the pony breeds are moving towards anyway. A lot of money to be made there for some enterprising person as I just can't see; Dartmoor, Exmoor, Highland, etc. carrying 1/4th animals in their registry. |
|
|
Tucked away somewhere I have the first edition
of the Hill Pony Newsletter. It is wonderful to see how the A ponies have
been celebrated. It is getting so hard to find an A, and as far as that
goes any Welsh, that can go with the light front ends on many of today’s
ponies. The hunter arena has certainly had its influence, and that not a
positive one for the Welsh breed. Now even the pony hunter breeders are
scrambling for ponies able to get their fronts up. And it is sad to see
ponies that can move only because the handler holds its front up; but
because they were such winning ponies in the UK people are scrambling to
breed to them. People dont have a clue, many don’t even look. They don’t
know what to look for so only go by show records. Time was we had good
Welsh because the folks who had them were actually knowledgeable horsemen
and knew what it took to breed on good stock.
The Sec A (the heart and soul of all that which is Welsh), nor any other pure bred Welsh, needs the partbreds . The partbreds need the REAL thing to give them creditability and merit. The reason for the breeding of partbreds is an attempt to make improvements by breeding to a better animal. There is NOT one thing a pure Welsh can not do that it needs the part bred ponies to promote it or give it credibility, nor does the purebred rely on the breeding of partbreds to survive in any manner. The purebred Welsh fills every need as it already is. Partbreds are NOT A BREED, they are there as a product of fads. So... ask yourselves… what has the BREED to gain from recording lesser and lesser partbreds? What are the goals of breeders of non purebreds... to emulate in a pony what they like in horse breeds used for their favorite performances, NOT to produce a better pony. Why have we the (TIC) "movement" for these lesser bred animals? Lets look at the strongest proponents of the part bred animals. Many have only half stock to breed and knew the rules long before they got into the position of not having any purebreds. But, rather than upgrade their stock, just change the rules, add a registry. It is the same as was done when geldings weren’t able to get a supreme championship as that title only went to breeding stock, stallions and mares, so make a gelding supreme section. It is just succumbing to crybaby mentality "I can’t have what I want, so change it so I can." Just what will the purebred Welsh have to gain from the promotion, or any other purpose, of partbreds in our Society…. WHICH IS ESTABLISHED ONLY for PURE bred Welsh. Take a lesson from the UK.... the WPCS records their parts BUT those PARTBREDS have their OWN society to promote THEMSELVES. Our society needs to take on the mentality of the Australian PM ... rules are rules and thats the way it is period. Don’t ever forget.... if we loose the A’s we LOOSE... WELSH and that is exactly the reality of what is at stake in this issue. WPCSA exists for pure Welsh Ponies and Cobs not for the membership nor owners. The declining numbers of Section A ponies being recorded is already a fact. Yes, it is already "THAT" bad. |
|
|
From: Margaret Badger Blackert Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 11:26 AM OK, here's a dissenting opinion to give us some balance... I have always believed the Half-Welsh registry was merely a way to recognize the Welsh influence in successful performance ponies. I can easily see the influence of grand-sires and grand-dams in their offspring. I think recognizing the Welsh influence to two generations back can only help people in general to appreciate the wonderful qualities of Welsh ponies. I do not consider the half-Welsh a "breed". I do believe recognizing the achievements of ponies of Welsh heritage does promote the breed, even if the ponies themselves are not purebred. The ponies will be bred whether or not they are registered with the WPCSA. I think the Welsh should get the credit for their influence. Part-bred to Part-bred cannot equal a Part-bred...there must be a purebred, registered grandsire or granddam. This will require breeders of open performance ponies to dip back into the purebred Welsh genepool at least every other generation. I think this does promote the Welsh and does further it's welfare. It allows people to breed the "type" of ponies they want without hi-jacking the breed itself to do so. Selective breeding of purebreds for a specific trait CAN be done within the breed. But I would prefer to see the Welsh breed left alone, and partbreds used to fill special needs. |
|
|
Marie Howran <howrans@...> wrote: I agree with Margaret, but would attempt to take this Part-bred thing one step further........ Nothing irks me more than folks trying to breed a "part-bred" to be a WELSH look-alike. THIS IS NOT A Part-bred in my books. If you want a Welsh pony, then breed or buy a "Purebred"! A part-bred should be bred with the intention of generating the "best" from both animals that are crossed. "An Enhancement". It should be "better than the Welsh alone" would have been. For this reason, a part-bred should have Welsh characteristics, but should NOT be a Welsh look-alike. In fact in my books, a part-bred that is an un-registerable purebred, would be marked down under this scheme. Part-breds are important to the Welsh breeder. For one, it proves the point that alot of breeders like to brag that "Welsh" improves almost any breed it is crossed with.For two, it creates an additional market that encourages those with stallions to use them. For three, it gives the Welsh the opportunity to prove its worth against other breeds that have amalgamated various breedings to improve the "Sport Pony". Welsh Part-bred should be able to hold their own, if we help them. I don't see part-breds as a drain or a threat to our Welsh breed, unless our breed doesn't have the integrity required to ensure it is "identifiable" as a breed in the first place. If that is the case then there is a larger problem than Part-breds. |
|
|
From: Denise Loeffel
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 8:13 AM In theory I agree, however, when the Welsh market is now, and has been for a long time, the hunter pony market, and MANY breeders are only breeding for the type Welsh that will fill that market, which is the "thorobredy" type both in the A's and B's, the "Welsh look" is fast disappearing in the purebreds. So how do you propose Judges are to know what to look for in a partbred? If our purebred Judges would only be true to the Welsh standard in purebred classes, it would make it easier to judge half-Welsh and partbreds. Judges need explicit direction on what is acceptable in the PUREBRED classes. Then they will know that those half and partbred ponies are being crossed to fill a purpose and could judge those ponies on their merits to fill that or those purposes; but when the purebred judges are ignoring the Welsh look or standard, then the breeders have to breed the purebreds for the same purpose the judges are judging for. This merging of PURPOSE and STANDARD ruins the ability to discern how the Welsh are improving the half and partbreds. I think the WPCSA's FIRST job should be is to INSIST that purebred classes, both in halter and performance, NOT be judged on how a Welsh pony looks to compete in OPEN PONY HUNTER classes or ANY OTHER OPEN DISCIPLINE. I think more emphasis should be put on the breeder/exhibitor's opinion of Judges, or even better, set up a Judges Panel at each show to rate the Judge(s). The panel should be made of breeders who do NOT compete their ponies in open shows, but who strive to compete only in Welsh shows; and there are many breeders who do that, or use older breeders who no longer breed or show but who want to be involved in the breed. If a Judge completes a show year and gets poor ratings from more than half the panels they were viewed by then DON'T reissue their judges license for Welsh until they learn to judge the Welsh breed by the WELSH STANDARD, not thorobred, not arab, not quarter horse, nor any performance standard. Yes, it may leave us with fewer judges, but they would be GOOD judges judging for the integrity of our breed standard. Then the look of the Welsh might return to the original standard; and the look of half and partbreds would be easily distinguised for judging purposes. |
|
|
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:32:16 -0700 Anonymously ~ I am against it |
|
|
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 I personally don't have a problem with a Part Bred Welsh Registry , we all know the UK has a very successful one and they flourish as a Society. I personally think it as a great addition to the Pure Bred Registry and the Part Bred Welsh as superb ambassadors as well . Some very fine Welsh Part breds have competed in and won world class events , I look forward to the Part Bred Society so long as we make sure there is more than 10% Welsh blood in their parentage. Mrs. Becky Israel |
|
|
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 As the owner and breeder of Welsh and part-Welsh ponies, I think it is appropriate to have a part Welsh registery. It will promote the value of the Welsh breeding and still identify out-crossed ponies and horses that have been bred as sport horses and other uses. I believe the part Welsh option is reasonable and valuable in helping maintain the contribution of Welsh genes in competitive horses and will permit expansion of the breed into other disciplines. Janet Arrowsmith-Lowe |
|
|
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 The Assoc. is already maintaining half-welsh registered ponies if the owners choose to process the paperwork. I feel this is enough. Any less of a percentage and the ponies will loose the Welsh type and could look like any other breed. My personal example.....I have a half Welsh Sect. B 3yo gelding out of a QH mare that has always thrown ponies BUT this guy is going to be 15.2H and looks nothing like a Welsh or half Welsh pony! Do members want a registry where the "ponies" could look like TBs, QHs, Arabs, Paints, etc., I sure hope not!! Many states like my home state, Virginia, are starting to maintain a state pony association so the bloodlines/pedigrees are recording and maintained anyway. Unless members are going to show at the Welsh shows what advantage is there to processing the half-Welsh or part-Welsh paperwork when states are maintaining breeder info?? As for the excessive white rule......it should be reinstated. Welsh ponies are not paint ponies. If not, STRICT DNA testing should be continued and VERIFIED on these ponies with excessive white. Was the rule changed just to accomidate a few breeders?? Personally I find it hard to believe that "somewhere" there are pure Welsh bloodlines carrying the Tobiano color pattern gene. Odd that it all of a sudden appears on one farm that is now standing a tobiano Paint stallion. If breeders want Paint ponies then leave the Welsh bloodlines out of it. I am still upset that there are Sect. B ponies registered and being sold as such when they are really Sect. A type and carry 3/4 Sect. A blood but just happen to grow over 12.2 H. Now breeders are wanting to make the ponies into Paints!! Since I am in the business of breeding, selling, training, etc. I prefer to remain anonymous....hard enough to make a living when people like you. Seems that honesty and integrity have little to do anymore with being successful. Of WHAT benefit to the PUREBRED WELSH, and HOW does it fulfill the mission statement of the WPCSA? is directly opposed, just as in the registration of pintos. SICK! if they truly want all that, they need to start another registry and not ruin this one! |
|
| I have attached a Newsletter I am sending out to all our members. Page four relates to your problem. I will also send it to anyone else I can think of who may help. What baffles me is that both the American and Canadian Associations seem so convinced they are trying to maintain the pure Welsh breeding? I looked at some Sec D cobs on some of their sites and they look more like overgrown Section B's! Where's the bone? I also read a report in the Green Journal (do you get it by the way?) by a Welsh judge who went over to adjudicate the Nationals last year. Bet he had a shock but was too polite to comment I guess. Anonymous | |
|
From: Cherry In the beginning, I mean way back, both here and in Wales, these associations were begin by BREEDERS of PUREBRED Welsh Ponies, for PUREBRED Welsh Ponies and to further that BREED in every way and to maintain it's PURITY. THAT is the reason for the registry in the first place, and that is the mission statement, no more mutable than the breed standard. Yes, I now feel the registration of half Welsh by the WPCSA was a big mistake, as was changing the way A and B ponies are registered, as was so much emphasis put on heads in A ponies which them became distorted into frog faces with gold fish eyes and these animals could neither see or breath properly, as was the conversion of a very strong and useful all purpose B pony into a show ring cutie with a pea brain, as was Cobs who now are so light and fine and nutty --- what can those do? And now---pinto and appaloosas, and 1/4 Welsh are to be carried in this registry too, WHERE for heaven's sake will it all stop? The Welsh registry was NEVER NEVER NEVER supposed to be INCLUSIVE to anyone and everyone who had some sort of wild idea about where to take it, but LIMITED to purebred animals of 100% Welsh blood, that is what a BREED is. Somewhere along the way everyone forgot that fact. Now of major concern is; money, producing great numbers of get from a single stud, money, being sure every market is covered with an animal of 'some' Welsh blood, money, accommodating every breeder of whatever persuasion who wants to twist 'Welsh' and breed for their own little piece of the market, money, being sure to stay up with the current show ring and breeding fads, money, well you see my point, even if you don't agree. Old fashioned, hard headed, yep that's me, but I do not see how you can whitewash the MISSION STATEMENT into something it is not, whether you like it or not---it is plain and it is LITERAL. |
|
From: Marie Maybe it was my visit to this year's AGM and all the "Excessive White" STUFF...but my view of all BREED REGISTRIES has forever been tainted. With all the research that I did into our infamous breed and the reading about "real doing Welsh", I have to disagree with this altruistic perspective. I disagree that the original registry was started to "protect" the breed. I believe that the original registry was started for $$ money. There was no benefit to the breed in registering specific animals at that time. In fact many people didn't have the $$ money required to even register their purebred animals at that time..... BUT there was significant benefit to those who started the registry. Do you think that their animals...regardless of quality were entered in the first stud books?? I'm sure that they ensured their animals qualified for that first registry. To follow this up, they then held the balance of power over all the others who sought membership afterwards. They also were allowed to control the animals & stallions that were allowed to graze on Crown lands. Definitely power and $$money as I recall. Yes...I'm cynical!! A good pony of Welsh type is still a good pony. In all my research I could not find anything that outlined the BENEFIT of a breed association or a purebred registry. Does it really help or hurt a breed?? To date, I cannot say that I have found any proof that our Registry has at all "helped" our breed. As Cherry states, we have bred tiny headed, frog-eyed ponies; ponies with bone so light their forebears would have looked like draft animals beside them. What have we done that was positive to protect and preserve this hardy pony breed?? If our Registry hasn't benefited the breeding of "purebred" animals, then what exactly has it done? OR Was it always to be about $$ Money?? I think personally, that it "was", "is" and likely always "will be" about $$Money. A few breeders have always been in it, to benefit the breed. I'm sure those idealists...many of them with thoughts exactly like ours ...Cherry included...will always exist for the "Right" reasons ......to help the breed. To breed excellent quality animals and to protect our Welsh. For us, those who care about what we are breeding, having 1/2 Welsh registered, should create a benefit and an additional market. After all, even we need $$ to continue our breeding programs, in our never ending search for the "perfect pony". Well...that is all for my "vent". |
|
|
Sun, 14 May 2006 O.K. , I'm following my first instinct and in my opinion the part bred welsh registry would NOT be a good thing for the WPCSA or the welsh pony. The welsh standard was written for a reason and need s to be used for both judging and breeding guidelines. Kim |
|
|
EXCESSIVE WHITE |
|
|
Until a few days ago I had not been near a
computer for months - when I read your posting re changes in registration
rules, my reaction was Wow! As I read it, "anything goes" so long as
registration applicant, sire and dam DNA tested and results verify that
applicant offspring of tested sire and dam. Are "these" ponies going to be
permitted to show as purebreds or just given papers to allow them to
remain in the Welsh gene pool?
If "these" ponies are allowed to show, will they be accepted in Canada and other Welsh registries? Just wondering..... as is a very important rule change. |
|
| People have been ignoring the rules for so long in all the countries, I don't know if there is any way to get the lid back on this Pandora's box. What people seem to fail to realize is that there are other venues for the Welsh ponies of color, they can have perfectly wonderful, successful, lucrative careers without full registration papers. I see no "stigma" with having a Welsh Pony with too much white to qualify for full registration papers. Please let me know how your saga unfolds. I hope it doesn't get ugly. There's plenty of room on this here planet for all kinds....but please, I would like everyone to follow the rules rather than changing them when it becomes too much trouble to follow them. | |
| I agree with you and yes I am not sure how you shut pandoras box either. It is as well though for the welsh breed that some are prepared to make the effort to find a way. I will certainly keep you posted on things here. I suspect after having judged the animal in question that he has sufficient roaning between his patches to have been allowed as one with sabino roaning. He is a good case study and certainly one that would be gelded and sold as a kids pony quietly somewhere if born in my paddock! | |
|
You all were supposed to 'educate'
yourselves---
Pinto ponies do NOT drop out of the sky, and YES, they are predictable, more or less like everything else ponywise. Coed Coch Prydydd CAN produce a lot of white markings when bred to the same sort of mares, others are BROCKWELL COBWEB (full brother to Brockwell Spider), COED COCH MADOG, producer of much white. Way back YOUNG RAINBOW MARE, out of YOUNG RAINBOW, by RAINBOW (color?), Coed Coch Seron, who is a great grand daughter of---you got it---COED COCH SEREN. No mystery here. YES, white surely IS predictable, IF---you know where to look. |
|
| Hi all! I have attached a Newsletter I am sending out to all our members. Page four relates to your problem. I will also send it to anyone else I can think of who may help. What baffles me is that both the American and Canadian Associations seem so convinced they are trying to maintain the pure Welsh breeding? I looked at some Sec D cobs on some of their sites and they look more like overgrown Section B's! Where's the bone? I also read a report in the Green Journal (do you get it by the way?) by a Welsh judge who went over to adjudicate the Nationals last year. Bet he had a shock but was too polite to comment I guess. Anonymous | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000 - 2006 |
|
|
Reg. Welsh mare 12.2hh Sec. B Welsh Section A Welsh mare, 12 hh |
|
|
13.2hh. 9y/o grey welsh-cross mare 13.2hh, Welsh Cross, Mare 13.1 grey welsh/TB mare |
|
|
DOES ANYONE GET THE POINT HERE? |
|